ArticleApplied GeophysicsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsLindsey J. HeagyDoulas W. OldenburgMarch 7, 2019https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.11.010Download PDFBack to ArticleDownload ArticleContentsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsEquationsFiguresaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfTablesSupporting Documentsconductanceconstitutiverelationsdcequationsdiscretedcccdiscretedcnodaldiscretefdemebdiscretefdemhjmaxwellfreqmaxwelltimepermeanceaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfcommer-comparisonFigure 10:Field strength ratio, FSR, for a reciever positioned 3cm beneath the plane of the source. For comparison, we have plotted the FSR for the permeable pipe when the source and reciever lie in the same plane (L=0.00m) with the semi-transparent orange lines. Note that the infinite-pipe solutions for L=0.03m and L=0.00m overlap.Figuresaugustin-response-function-sigmaFiguresaugustinbfields