ArticleApplied GeophysicsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsLindsey J. HeagyDoulas W. OldenburgMarch 7, 2019https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.11.010Download PDFBack to ArticleDownload ArticleContentsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsEquationsFiguresaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfTablesSupporting Documentsconductanceconstitutiverelationsdcequationsdiscretedcccdiscretedcnodaldiscretefdemebdiscretefdemhjmaxwellfreqmaxwelltimepermeanceaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfcommer-comparisonFigure 14:Secondary magnetic flux density for a conductive well (top row) and a conductive, permeable well (bottom row) through time. The source waveform is a step-off waveform.FiguresbfdemFigurescommer-mesh