ArticleApplied GeophysicsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsLindsey J. HeagyDoulas W. OldenburgMarch 7, 2019https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2018.11.010Download PDFBack to ArticleDownload ArticleContentsModeling electromagnetics on cylindrical meshes with applications to steel-cased wellsEquationsFiguresaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfTablesSupporting Documentsconductanceconstitutiverelationsdcequationsdiscretedcccdiscretedcnodaldiscretefdemebdiscretefdemhjmaxwellfreqmaxwelltimepermeanceaugustin-response-function-muaugustin-response-function-sigmaaugustin3cmaugustinbfieldsaugustinfsrbfdembtdemcommer-meshcommer-modelcommer-resultscyl-finite-volumecylwrapfdemnsfkaufman-finite-wellkaufman-setupkaufman-zonesmagnetic-flux-density-mumagnetic-flux-density-sigmatdem-currentstdemnsfcommer-comparisonFigure 12:Secondary magnetic flux density (with respect to a whole-space primary) at five different frequencies for a conductive pipe (top row) and for a conductive, permeable pipe (bottom row).FiguresaugustinfsrFiguresbtdem